Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 9, 2017, the Defendant driven a two-lane 1401 square meters in the front of the third apartment of the 1401 large-scale apartment in Tae-do around 19:38, and driven a BF rocketing car along the first lane.

At the same time, the driver had been at night, and it was difficult to do so, so the driver had a duty of care to safely drive the front door and the left door well and the left door, and to safely drive the restricted speed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded at a speed of 87 km per hour exceeding 60 km per hour, which is a Domin, and taken place a part of the victim C (V, 6 years of age) and victim D (V, 39 years of age) who crosses the road to the right side on the left side of the front side of the madin bank due to the fin negligence, which led to the front and front glass part of the above vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant caused the death of the victim D due to the cage cage at the same place of the business negligence as the cage cage and the pulmonary cage due to the sage, and suffered injury to the victim C with the victim D who dried the road along with the victim D, including approximately two weeks of credit cryp, for which treatment is required.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A corpse inspection report and a corpse inspection report;

1. A report on investigation (whether to be bound by the vehicle);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of a medical certificate);

1. Article 3(1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of an occupational and an occupational physician), Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (the occupation of an occupational and an occupational occupation);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. In light of the fact that the victims were dead or injured due to the violation of the speed of the defendant on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected against the defendant.