The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is a doctor outside of a hospital in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon.

When the Defendant, at around 17:45 on September 8, 2009, had the victim D(44 years old) who had been suffering from a traffic accident at the 2nd floor of the instant C Hospital surgery performed a lacing surgery before being operated, he/she should have the victim D(44 years old) where he/she had the lacing surgery removed the lacule. In order to confirm whether the context of the lacule between the head of the Gu and the head of the Gu was flexible, and if the lacule confirmed the lacule, he/she should perform a lacing operation without damaging the context of the lacule, and if the lacule had the 19th floor of the instant C Hospital removed the lacule surgery, in violation of the duty of care to take measures against the lacule due to damage in the context of the lacing surgery, and did not change the lacule into the lacary surgery without changing the lac.

2. Determination:

A. The following facts are acknowledged in light of the Defendant’s investigative agency, part of the Defendant’s statements in this Court, witness E and F’s statements in this Court, each fact inquiry reply to the Korean Medical Association, the autopsy report, and other evidence.

(1) On February 22, 2009, the victim suffered a serious injury, such as complete paralysis, etc., due to a traffic accident, at C Hospital where the defendant works on February 27, 2009.