logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.09.14 2017구단51856
추가상병불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff, from November 1, 1977, had been working as the digging field in the B B coal mine and the Taean Mining Co., Ltd. for about twenty-three years.

After that, from July 3, 2013 to December 1, 2014, the food waste collection business was conducted as a street cleaners in the wholesale industry from July 3 to December 1, 2014.

The Plaintiff used an excessive handout trees due to the continuous use of the vibration tools and the heavy food waste collection work after the retirement of the KGGRD industry, and was diagnosed on February 24, 2015, and approved medical treatment on November 10, 2015 with respect to the “SGRDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Upon receipt of this paragraph, the defendant applied for additional injury and disease to the defendant.

On August 29, 2016, the Defendant’s notice of approval for additional injury and disease on the ground that “as a result of consulting two advisory doctors on the ground of relevant medical records, etc. with two advisory doctors of the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service on the ground of the relevant medical records, etc., the Defendant’s notice of approval for additional injury and disease due to age increase rather than work ability,” is

A) The Plaintiff filed a petition for review against the Plaintiff, but the petition was dismissed on November 16, 2016. [The grounds for recognition are not asserted, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Eul evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that: (a) while working as a street cleaners for approximately one year and five months in light of approximately twenty-three (23) years, the Plaintiff had been repeatedly engaged in an operation, such as the use of vibration tools, food waste removal, etc. for a long time; and (b) the burden was accumulated on the part of the shoulder as well as the water parts and grandchildren; and (c) the instant additional injury was caused following the instant existing injury.

The instant additional injury or disease was caused by the Plaintiff’s performance of its duties.

arrow