The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, suspended execution for three years, 40 hours in a compliance driving lecture, community service work for 320 hours) of the lower court is deemed to be too uneasible and unfair.

2. In light of the judgment, the Defendant committed each of the instant accidents by driving a high-priced tunnel with a blood alcohol level of 0.136%. In light of the video data CDs, it appears that the speed of the vehicle driven by the Defendant was considerable at the time of the accident. The victim of the first accident changed the vehicle rapidly to avoid collision with the vehicle driven by the Defendant, and faced with the right side wall in the tunnel, and thus, the Defendant seems to have been aware of it as a matter of course. The victim of the second accident runs away from the tunnel. The victim of the second accident suffered significant damage to the extent of scrapping of the vehicle by collision with the Defendant’s vehicle running ahead at a speed above the bend, without any delay. Since the vehicle driven by the Defendant is merely covered by liability insurance, and is not covered by a comprehensive insurance, and thus, it is difficult for the victims to compensate the victims for damages or to completely stop the vehicle at the speed of the accident, such as a large-scale vehicle that the Defendant did not get out of the entrance of the Central Road without any justifiable reason, and thus, the victim’s argument that the second vehicle and the two-way.

3. If so, the prosecutor's appeal is with merit. Thus, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is again after pleading.