The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is against the defendant's wrong recognition of his mistake, the amount of damage caused by the fraud of this case is not significant, and the defendant deposited the amount of damage caused by the victim G in the court below for the victim C at the court below, and the defendant seems to have a good health condition as a first-class disabled person. However, the defendant committed each of the fraud of this case against a third-class merchant. Accordingly, the defendant committed an additional crime by taking advantage of the identity of the second-class K who was arrested as an offender in the act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an offense and under investigation by the police. Accordingly, the defendant committed an additional crime by taking account of the following facts: the nature of the crime is very poor; there are many records that the defendant was punished for the same crime of this case; the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime; the defendant was sentenced to a fine twice during the period of repeated crime due to the same fraud; the defendant again committed the crime of this case during the same period; the defendant's age, character and behavior, the circumstances and the result of the crime of this case;

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.