1. Of the real estate listed in the list No. 2 of the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 14, and 1 of the attached Form No. 2, each point shall be in sequence.

According to the whole purport of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and the entire purport of the pleading, the following facts can be acknowledged: (a) with respect to the real estate listed in Nos. 1 and 2 of the annexed real estate list No. 2 and 2 of the annexed real estate (hereinafter "the real estate of this case") and the real estate of this case owned 2/5 shares, and (b)

In this regard, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit seeking partition of co-owned property as to the instant real estate with the Defendants, but failed to reach an agreement. In full view of the fact that the Plaintiff presented the method of partition as stated in the Disposition No. 1 and the Defendants did not raise any objection, it is reasonable to divide the instant real estate between the Plaintiff and the Defendants by the above method, and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition.