logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2007. 07. 10. 선고 2006누27733 판결
부동산매매업에 해당되는지 여부[국승]
Title

Whether it falls under real estate trading business

Summary

In light of the frequency and frequency of real estate transactions, the holding period, the scale of sale and purchase, the current status of real estate holding, etc., it is recognized that real estate is engaged in real estate wholesale business by acquiring and transferring real estate continuously and repeatedly for profit from the beginning.

Related statutes

Article 6 (Supply of Goods)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant shall revoke the disposition of imposition of value-added tax of KRW 405,470,758 against the plaintiff on June 17, 2005.

Reasons

The reasoning for this Court’s implementation is as follows: (a) the first instance court’s decision is the same as the reason for the first instance judgment, except for deletion of the fourth through nine (9) of the first instance judgment; and (b) thus, (c) Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow