logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.13 2015가단5128106
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From October 11, 2014, the above-mentioned A

(b).

Reasons

Attached Form

Each fact in the cause of the claim shall be acknowledged by adding up the whole purpose of the pleadings to the statements in Gap 1 through 4.

Therefore, the lease contract concluded between the plaintiffs and the defendant regarding the real estate stated in the separate sheet is deemed to have been lawfully terminated upon arrival of the defendant by the content-certified mail on March 16, 2015, which contains the defendant's expression of termination of the contract on the ground of the rent delay. Thus, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate stated in the separate sheet to the plaintiffs and return the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to KRW 1,650,000, which was the agreed rent from October 11, 2014 to the completion date of delivery of the real estate stated in the separate sheet.

Therefore, the plaintiffs' claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow