beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiffs owned the real estate indicated below in Seongdong-gu Seoul (hereinafter the instant real estate) and decided to accept the instant real estate to D Housing Redevelopment and Development Project Association (hereinafter the instant association), and requested the instant association to compensate for losses, such as curios and high-priced materials, etc. The instant association did not accept the Plaintiffs’ request and filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff B. On October 29, 2013, the said court affirmed that “The instant association shall pay KRW 1,994,923,059 to B with compensation due to the purchase price of real estate, sales compensation, directors’ expenses, and religious activities of religious facilities, etc.” on October 29, 2013, the said court determined that “The instant association shall pay KRW 1,994,923,059 to C,14,126,239,259, and KRW 846,879,259 to E,50,698,913, respectively.”
In addition, the owner’s real estate is transferred, the Plaintiff, Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, which is the Plaintiff F Site of Seongdong-gu 9.1742 square meters and 226.652 square meters of F Site of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 14.22 square meters of G Site of 14.22 square meters, and the Plaintiff, Seongdong-gu, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, Seoul, 9.1742 square meters of F Site of Seongdong-gu, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 19.1742 square meters of H site
B. After receiving the above money from the instant association and delivering the instant real estate in accordance with the above compulsory adjustment decision, the Plaintiffs reported the transfer income tax including KRW 300,000,00 (A90,000, B100,000, C110,000,000, and C110,000,000) paid in connection with the said lawsuit on February 28, 2014 ( Plaintiff A125,489,586, B306,706,070, Plaintiff C127,734,310, and 310) as necessary expenses for the transfer income tax.
C. The Defendant, as the litigation cost for the increase of compensation, is not directly required to secure the ownership, etc. of the instant real estate, and thus, does not constitute necessary expenses for transferred assets, to the Plaintiff A on November 3, 2014.