The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that determination is based on the following: (a) the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes; and (b) the victim’s damage is not significant.

On the other hand, the defendant committed the crime of this case under the same law again even though he did not reach two months after the execution of the sentence due to the criminal punishment for the crime of the same kind, in particular, since he committed the crime of this case under the same law even though he did not end the sentence due to the criminal punishment for the crime of this case, the crime of this case is committed, and since the nature of the crime is not very good, the sentence of the defendant cannot be avoided, and considering the criminal power or the method of the defendant, etc., it is evaluated that the risk of recidivism is high, the defendant was not restored to the trial, the damage was not restored to the trial, the defendant did not agree with the victim, there was no change in special circumstances or circumstances that are newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the court below was made, and there is no other changes in the defendant's age, character and conduct, the motive and circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the above argument by the defendant cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.