logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2016.07.01 2016고단413
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle B and C with freight in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the death or injury prior to the risk)

On February 18, 2016, the Defendant driven the above cargo while under the influence of alcohol 0.142% during blood transfusions, and proceeded at the speed of one lane from the room of the office to the front of the D cafeteria located in the new Gun C, if he desires to run the above cargo vehicle in front of the D cafeteria located in the new Gun C.

At the time, it was difficult at night, and there was a possibility for customers to cross the commercial building due to the relationship between both sides of the road. In such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim E (50 years old) and the victim F (47 years old) who passed the road to port from the right side of the marina course due to the negligence that he neglected to drive in the front of the road while it is difficult for the Defendant to drive in a normal condition while under the influence of alcohol, and was at the same time driven by the Defendant.

After all, the defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence such as injury such as a cage cage cages, etc. which require approximately five weeks of medical treatment to victims E, and injury such as a chest cage, etc. which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment to victims F.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) Defendant 1 driven the above B Ⅲ truck while under the influence of alcohol content of about 600 meters from a 600-meter section to a 0.142% of alcohol content in the front of the said D cafeteria, which is a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a new city

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. A traffic accident report, an accident scene map and a circumstantial report (a dangerous driving);

arrow