The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. However, there are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the crime and reflects, the crime of this case appears to have occurred as a result of contingency while the Defendant’s daily behavior and the victim disputed each other, and the fact that the Defendant has grown in the poor family environment.

However, the defendant has been sentenced three times to be fined for violent crime, the victim and his family members were collected from the victim, resulting in serious mental pain, resulting in 50 days before the victim's upper part of the left side, the wall stroke, the stove on the left side, the stove, and the stoves from stove, etc. The victim suffered three times under overall anesthesia, but the victim is expected to undergo three operations, and there is a possibility of a merger, such as inside-gu, stove, the stove, and the loss of stove function, while attending the police department, although the victim was in the police department, he was not able to employ police officers in the future, but it seems difficult to employ police officers due to the above injury, but there was no agreement with the victim, damage was not recovered at all, the victim and his family members were suffering from serious mental pain, the victim was stoved from the defendant, and there was no change in circumstances in circumstances before and after the crime, the circumstances and circumstances of the defendant were found too unfair.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.