logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.02.18 2014가단78351
매매대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 63,250,000 and its amount shall be 20% per annum from October 15, 2014 to September 30, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. It is recognized that there is no dispute between the parties to the judgment on the claim or the following facts are acknowledged according to the evidence No. 1, and the defendant is obligated to pay the money stated in the order to the plaintiff.

On October 24, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a basic contract for manufacturing goods with the Defendant, which is a facility to cut off the co-days consisting of the middle slicker in purchasing the Defendant, and the Defendant purchased them from the Hanyang Industries company located in Yangyang city (hereinafter “instant machinery”), and is to receive KRW 155,00,000 (value-added tax) from the Defendant.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract”). Article 3 (Place of Delivery”): 5 (1) of the Defendant’s factory (subject to the Articles of Incorporation of Busan District Office); the Plaintiff’s factory (subject to the Articles of Incorporation of Busan District Office); (2) remove, remove, and install new and additional products; (3) remove, remove, and install the instant machinery in light; (2) content of the new and additional products; - 1 bit LOPOP TBL - TN (TNSOS PAD) - 1 bit LOST - 1 bit LOL - 1 strawls (DENSOTR TRALL) - 1 bit LOL mprawlsn (DEL) - ContentsS increase in electric and oil pressure system - Contents system repair and repair and - machinery-based basic tar construction and machinery- primary tar construction works

B. Around February 2014, the Plaintiff removed the instant machinery from luminous appearance and completed the construction of the Defendant’s factory. However, the Plaintiff did not receive 63,250,000 won out of the price stipulated in the instant contract from the Defendant.

2. The defendant's assertion and judgment as to it

A. In manufacturing and installing a new content pattern among the instant machinery, the Plaintiff’s assertion is due to the occurrence of a defect in the cryp of the cryp, which was cut off due to the impossibility of properly installing a hydrotension that regulates the strength of cryping, and the cryp of the cryp does not automatically operate.

arrow