Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Clearning car.

On December 16, 2016, the Defendant driven a frighting car on the 18:15th day of December, 2016, and continued the front road of the E, which is located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, to the four-distance away from the four-distance away from the area of the shot-gu, Daejeon.

Since the location is a road with a crosswalk on which a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the new code, checking whether he/she is well able to live the front door, and whether he/she is a

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the Defendant to drive the vehicle in violation of the signal, thereby causing the Victim F (the age of 34) who dried the crosswalk from the right side of the Defendant’s driving direction to the left side of the pedestrian crossing in accordance with the pedestrian signals.

Defendant 1 suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as the 14 weeks of medical treatment, such as the string of the right snick, the outer side of the side, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution: The degree of negligence is heavy, the degree of injury to the victim of the crosswalk is serious, circumstances favorable to the extent of injury to the victim: confessions and reflects, primary crimes, vehicle comprehensive insurance, and agreements are made with the victim in violation of the signal;