(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.07.20 2017고단571

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.07.20 2017고단571

교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CPoter II freight vehicles.

On March 17, 2017, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicles around 09:00, and led the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes between the 60-lanes of the national road adjacent to the intersection E, which is located in the Donan-gun, Naman-gun.

At that time, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to check the safety of course and drive the motor vehicle by checking well the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, as the driver of a motor vehicle is in the process of driving the motor vehicle along the victim F(21 tax) in front of the defendant's driving direction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to stop driving on the front bank, thereby changing the lane from the two lanes to the one lane, and caused the Defendant’s fault in changing the lane from the two lanes to the one lane in front of the freight vehicle of the Defendant, which led to a shocking part of the victim’s bicycle left part of the bicycle that the Defendant drives.

around 02:45 on March 31, 2017, the Defendant caused the victim to die in cerebral with Mara in the process of medical treatment at the Joseon University Hospital located in 365, Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. In full view of the following circumstances that can be comprehensively acknowledged as follows, namely, the instant traffic accident occurred while the Defendant changed the fleet from the second lane to the first lane, and ② the Defendant appears to have not used the horn while driving ahead, the instant traffic accident occurred due to the Defendant’s negligence. In full view of the fact that: (a) the instant traffic accident occurred while the Defendant changed the fleet from the second lane to the first lane; and (b) the Defendant appears to have caused the instant traffic accident due to the Defendant’s negligence.

As such, the defendant and his defense counsel who fulfilled their duty of care are admitted.

유사 판례

-춘천지방법원 2016.05.31 2015고단29

-광주지방법원 2016.07.14 2015고정1673

-대구지방법원 2017.12.14 2017고단2686

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.04.29 2016고단119

-서울남부지방법원 2017.12.07 2017고단4745