logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.08.19 2013가단82650
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

On November 2, 2009, the Plaintiff, as the cause of the instant claim, entered into an oral contract with the Defendant for construction works incidental to the Changwon-si building B, Changwon-si, which was ordered by the Ireland Korea Co., Ltd., with KRW 183,790,000, and then entered into an additional construction contract with KRW 10,000,000. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant and Grandland Korea received part of the construction works and received the remainder KRW 43,790

In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the testimony of the witness C, Ireland Korea has entered into an agreement on January 14, 2010 to make a direct payment of the work price of the plaintiff, with the defect in the application for rehabilitation and the demand of the defendant and Grandland Korea for the direct payment of the work price of the plaintiff on January 29, 2010 when it entered into an agreement with Ireland Korea to make a direct payment of the work price of the plaintiff on January 14, 2010 when it entered into an agreement with the plaintiff on January 14, 2010.

2. It is recognized that in 12.12., 40 million won is paid directly to the defendant and paid 50 million won as a loan to the defendant.

According to the above facts, the defendant's obligation to pay the subcontract price to the plaintiff was extinguished due to the agreement on the direct payment of the construction price between the plaintiff and Grandland Korea.

The remaining construction cost of the plaintiff's assertion is considered to be a legal dispute resolved between Ireland Korea and therefore it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow