logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2017.03.30 2017고단148
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) reported around 22:00, around 22:00, at around 112, and obstructed the handling of the said police officer’s 112 reports and the performance of duties concerning the protection of the people’s body, and interfered with the gist of evidence, where E, a police official of the police station of the original State Police Station, who was a police officer of the police station, intends to board a taxi to have the Defendant returned to Korea; (b) took the face of the said police officer once on the floor of hand; (c) walking the said police officer twice in his/her mouth; (d) interfered with the handling of the said police officer’s 1

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (overtime 4);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended sentence] There is no person [the person subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (six months to one year and six months) [the decision of sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] the State requires strict degree of interference with the performance of official duties in order to protect the legitimate performance of official duties and to establish a sound social order, and the degree of violence is not easy; the degree of violence is not easy; the crime was committed by taking a bath for about thirty minutes even after being taken to the police box, and the circumstances after the crime were committed, such as avoiding disturbance, and the defendant was found to have been wrong; there is no history of criminal punishment; the defendant's age, sex, character, intelligence, environment, motive, means and result of the crime; and other circumstances, such as the order of punishment, are determined by comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances.

arrow