beta
Text
1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.
purport, purport, ..
Reasons
The following facts, which have become final and conclusive, are apparent or apparent in this Court’s records.
The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit identical to the purport of the claim against R, as the Suwon District Court 2013Gahap17080 against R, Defendant C, D, E, F, G, H, H, K, K, L, M, N, and R, and the said court rendered a judgment that all of the Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed on March 20, 2015.
The Plaintiff appealed as Seoul High Court 2015Na2017737, which was dissatisfied with the first instance judgment, and the said court dismissed the Plaintiff’s appeal on August 27, 2015.
(hereinafter referred to as “the subject decision for review”). The subject decision for review became final and conclusive on September 19, 2015 as the chief of the appeal.
After that, on January 23, 2019, the deceased on January 23, 2019, and on July 19, 2019, on each real estate listed in the separate list No. 1, 2, 5, 7, and 8 as to each real estate listed in the defendant CD and the separate list No. 3, and 4 as to each real estate listed in the defendant CD and the separate list No. 3, and No. 3, and No. 4 as to each real estate listed in the separate list No. 3, and No. 6 were transferred to the deceased B’s legal proceedings.
Plaintiff’s assertion
In addition, the judgment for retrial by the Plaintiff is determined based on the written reply (No. 41, No. 11-2, No. 41, No. 11-2, etc., which is a false official document, and thus, there exists a ground for retrial under Article 451(1)6 of the Civil Procedure Act, and the Plaintiff determined that the performance of all delegated duties was not completed even though it is apparent that all delegated duties were performed by the Plaintiff. Thus, there is a ground
Judgment
Article 451(1)6 of the Civil Procedure Act provides that “when documents and other articles used as evidence for a judgment have been forged or altered,” as one of the grounds for retrial, Article 451(1)6 of the Civil Procedure Act provides that “when documents and other articles used as evidence for a judgment have been forged or altered,” and Article 451(2) of the Civil Procedure Act provides that “in cases falling under Article 451(1)4 through 7,