logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.05.30 2014고정1374
상해
Text

Each public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendant A indicated in the facts charged in the instant case on January 12, 2014 as “ January 12, 2013.” However, it appears to be a clerical error in “ January 12, 2014.”

(See the witness F’s legal statement, investigation records, 38 pages). At the E station located in Incheon Strengthening Group D, an assault was committed against the victim F, and the assault was set up against it, such as plucking, plucking, etc. of the said victim.

B. Defendant B is as Defendant B’s each share of January 12, 2014.

At the E station located in G, G, Incheon, U.S., Defendant A’s contact with the victim, and the victim F expressed that the victim F would be “Is any spare years,” and assaulted the victim F, such as walkinging the water cup that the said victim was drinking.

2. Each of the above facts charged is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. The victim withdraws his/her wish to punish the Defendants from this court on May 20, 2014, after the prosecution of the instant case was instituted, so the prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow