The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal asserts that the punishment imposed by the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects the mistake, and that the health condition is not good due to the appearance in a white paper, etc.

However, considering the following circumstances: (a) the crime of this case was committed by deceiving the victim by deceiving the victim, and the amount of damage is considerable; (b) the defendant did not submit particular data on recovery of damage up to the trial court; and (c) the defendant committed the crime of this case even though he had been punished several times in the past and was in the repeated crime period due to the same kind of crime; and (d) the defendant committed the crime of this case at another time, etc., which is disadvantageous to the defendant; and (e) other circumstances, such as the defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., which are conditions for the argument of this case and sentencing

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.