logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.05.25 2018고단910
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 27, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating road traffic law (drinking driving) in the Seo-gu District Court’s branch branch branch on November 27, 2008, and a fine of KRW 4 million on November 4, 2013 by the same court on the same crime, respectively, for two or more occasions.

On February 8, 2018, while under the influence of alcohol leveling to 0.097% from blood alcohol leveling around 22:20, the Defendant driven a C-W-man car in the section of about 200 meters from the front of the jum cafeteria, which is located in the Daegu Suwon-dong, to the road after the drum apartment located in the same Gu-gu 59.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement report and investigation report on the situation of the driver at the main place of business (report on the situation of the driver at the main place of business);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry about criminal history, investigation report (Attachment to a summary order of the same kind of power);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44-2 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act has the history of being punished for the same crime, the defendant's reflects the defendant, the defendant's reflects the fact that there is no criminal record exceeding the fine, the defendant has no criminal record, and

arrow