1. Of the part concerning the counterclaim in the judgment of the court of first instance, the amount equivalent to the following amount ordered to be paid (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. The court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus cites it by applying the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The reasoning of the judgment of the court as to the claim on this part is as stated in Paragraph 2 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the dismissal of some contents as follows. Thus, this part is cited by applying the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to the claim on this part is reversed

A. 2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) of each sentence (1-3) shall be deleted and the previous (2) part (7, 14 through 16) shall be deleted.

3. Judgment on the counterclaim

A. A. 1) A lessor to determine the cause of a claim for damages arising from interference with the collection of premiums was revised to “not later than six months before the lease term expires.” Before the lease term expires, a lessor shall not interfere with the lessee’s receipt of premiums from a person who wishes to become a new lessee arranged by the lessee under the contract for premiums by refusing to enter into a lease contract with a new lessee arranged by the lessee without any justifiable reason until the lease term expires, and shall be liable to compensate for damages if the lessee causes damages in violation of such obligation (Article 10-4(1)4 and (3) of the former Commercial Building Lease Protection Act (amended by Act No. 15791, Oct. 16, 2018; hereinafter referred to as “the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act”).