The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. Basic facts

A. The land at 1793, G, Seocheon-gun, Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter “instant land No. 1”), and H No. 764, including the land assessment and registration of initial ownership (hereinafter “instant land”) at 1793, G, Seocheon-gun, Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter “instant land”); and the land at 2,000, in addition to the land at 1, the instant land at 1914, 1914 (hereinafter “instant assessment

3.15. 15. The F residing in Bocheon-gun E is written in the Land Survey Book (Evidence A (Evidence A).

The cadastral record on the land of this case was filed in the 625 War.

The land of this case No. 1 is deemed to be the land of this case 1104 square meters (hereinafter “the land of this case”) before Dongcheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, and the land of this case 4823 square meters before Seocheon-si, Gyeonggi-do.

A. The land of this case No. 2 was the land of this case, and the "3 land of this case" of 126m2,00,000,00

(B) On November 15, 1969, the Defendant completed the registration of initial ownership in relation to the land Nos. 1 and 2 of this case as the receipt of Macheon District Court’s Macheon District Court’s 5195, and as to the land No. 3 of this case on September 30, 2004 as the receipt of 32691 by the same registry office. (B) On February 16, 1927, the deceased on February 16, 1927, and the deceased on October 3, 197, and the J jointly succeeded to J by the Plaintiff, K, L, and M (based on recognition). The purport of each entry and the entire pleadings in No. 1 through No. 6 (including a serial number), are as follows.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the evidence as seen earlier prior to the determination of the cause of the claim and the results of the fact-finding on the Kancheon Market, F, the assessment title of the land of this case, and I, the Plaintiff’s preference, are deemed to be the same person in light of the Chinese name, redemption, address, permanent domicile, etc.

As such, as the Plaintiff’s prior owner, I acquired the land of this case, which is the original land of the land Nos. 1, 2, and 3, as the assessment title holder, and as I died, the Plaintiff et al. succeeded jointly to the land in succession.

Therefore, the defendant.