The defendant is innocent.

1. 공소사실의 요지 C, D은 공모하여 2012. 11. 5.경부터 2012. 12. 10. 14:20경까지 대전 서구 E에 있는 ‘F게임랜드’에서 게임물등급위원회로부터 등급분류를 받은 네오아쿠아랜드 게임기 50대를 설치한 후 손님들에게 게임이용자의 판단 및 조작능력과는 무관하게 자동으로 위 게임이 진행되도록 변조된 사행성 전자식 유기기구인 게임기를 제공하면서 버튼자동누름장치인 일명 ‘똑딱이’를 제공하여 손님들로 하여금 우연한 결과에 따라 점수를 취득하도록 하고, 위 게임을 통해 점수 5,000점을 취득하면 손님들에게 시가 5,000원 상당의 은책갈피를 경품으로 제공하는 방법으로 사행행위 영업을 하였다.

The Defendant, while working as an employee at the above time and place, put the game machine with altered C and D into the said game machine with knowledge that he/she is engaged in speculative business as above, and aided and abetted the act by using the game machine with a view to committing such speculative business.

2. The police interrogation protocol against the defendant denies the contents of the protocol in this court, and thus, there is no admissibility of evidence, and the first police interrogation protocol against D as well as the first police interrogation protocol against D, since the defendant consented to it as evidence, it is not admissible. The other evidence submitted by the prosecution alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant served as an employee in the game of this case.

Rather, the phrase “the defendant does not have this entry in the game site” is understood by the police in a situation where the defendant is not well aware of the identity of the employee of the game room because he was not actually involved in the operation of the game room by being asked to the testimony of the unemployment C, G, G, the customer, I and J, and the personal information of the employee of the game room.