1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B shall be KRW 4,00,000 and a rate of 20% per annum from December 3, 2014 to the date of complete payment.

1. As to the defendants' primary claims

A. (1) On September 12, 2014, the Plaintiff had access to the wrapping Internet Bank System for the purpose of packing.

However, the container connected by the Plaintiff was a false container opened by the winners of the name.

(2) After the Plaintiff entered personal information, etc. in the said wrap, the following money was automatically transferred from the Plaintiff’s agricultural bank account to the Defendants’ account.

- 1 million won from the Plaintiff’s E account to the F account in the name of Defendant B (hereinafter “instant account”) - 1 million won from the Plaintiff’s E account to the Plaintiff’s 1 account in the instant case - 2 million won from the Plaintiff’s E account to the 1 account in the Plaintiff’s name of Defendant C (hereinafter “instant 2 account”) - 6 million won from the Plaintiff’s G account to the H account in the name of Defendant C (hereinafter “instant 3 account”) in the Plaintiff’s name of Defendant C from the Plaintiff’s G account - 7 million won from the Plaintiff’s G account to the J account in the name of Defendant D (hereinafter “instant 4 account”) (3) from the Plaintiff’s 7 million won from the Plaintiff’s 1 account to the Defendant’s name of Defendant D (hereinafter “instant 4 account”). 4 million won from the instant account to the instant 2 account, and 4 million won from the third party account to the instant third party account, and 36 million won from the instant account to the instant account.

[Based on the recognition] Defendant 1: The fact that there is no dispute between Defendant 2 and 3 of Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act; Gap 1 and 2; Gap 1 and 2; the result of each order to submit financial information on the Samsung Securities, SK Securities, Had Investment Securities, and Dae-dong Saemaul Depository; the purport of the entire pleadings

B. (1) The Plaintiff transferred money from his own account to the Defendants’ account, in response to the name-dissovered person.

The defendants gain profits from the money remaining in their accounts in their names without any legal grounds, and the plaintiff suffered losses equivalent to the money.

Defendant B’s balance of KRW 4 million; Defendant C’s balance of KRW 4,99,911; and Defendant D’s balance of KRW 3,000 in the account of this case; and Defendant D’s balance of KRW 3,600 in the account of this case, respectively.