A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On August 4, 2004, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor due to night residence intrusion, larceny, etc. in the leisure branch of Suwon District Court. On March 18, 2010, the Seoul High Court sentenced one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor due to robbery, and seven years of imprisonment with prison labor due to violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection of Victims (special robbery, Rape, etc.) from Seoul High Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on July 28, 2018.

1. At night, on June 22, 2020, the Defendant: (a) intruded the victim D (Inn, 81 years of age) who was located in Innju City B apartment C on June 22, 2020; (b) had not been corrected in front of the house of the victim D (inn, 81 years of age); (c) had the victim invadedd the cres in the ward, and caused the victim’s cash 40,000 won, which is the victim’s ownership, to be taken out in the string.

2. At around 00:45 on June 22, 2020, the Defendant attempted to attack the victim’s house located in the victim’s house, such as the above paragraph (1) and the Defendant failed to comply with the victim’s failure to comply with it, and subsequently failed to comply with the victim’s failure to comply with it. In the event that the victim did not receive money, the Defendant took the victim’s house, “I am satisfy,” “I am sat.” and “I am satfy,” and “I am satfy, I am satfy

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination of the accused's suspect's interrogation statement by prosecution;

1. An inquiry report about D's statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification as to whether a suspect has shown the same kind of power and repeated crimes);

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes provided for in Articles 330, 352, and 350 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. From among concurrent offenders, the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act was punished as night intrusion larceny for the reason of sentencing, and Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, considering the fact that a repeated crime is a repeated crime due to robbery, it shall be considered disadvantageously considering the fact that the defendant is a repeated crime due to robbery and reflects, and that the defendant appears to be a contingent crime due to the occurrence of a