logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2014.07.09 2014고단311
위계공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won, and a fine of 300,000 won, respectively, for Defendant B.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the master who is concurrently the owner of the deep fishing boat C(39 tons) in the inshore fishing boat (the nominal owner is the wife B) at the port of the Si/Gu and the Si/Gun/Eup.

In order to have a license for the sixth mate renewed, he/she shall have at least one year of duties suitable for the license within five years prior to the date of application for renewal, or at least two years of work experience on board a ship which is not a ship's personnel.

1. On February 6, 2013, the Defendants’ co-offendered Defendant A submitted to the public official E in charge of issuing a marine officer’s license at the public service center of the public service center of the port located in the port located in the port located in the north-gu Office of Port and Port Office at the port and port on the port on which February 6, 2013, to the public official E in charge of issuing a marine officer’s license, for the period from October 1, 2008 to December 5, 2009 and from June 1, 2010 to August 30, 2011, the Defendants’ co-defendantd Defendant B’s work experience certificate prepared in the name of the Defendant B’s wife in the c(39 tons) located in the Si/Gu Yanpo-si, the relevant fishing vessel’s crew members, the medical certificate, the certificate of personal seal impression

However, even though Defendant A did not board the decks of the Si/Gu Yanpo-Eup from October 1, 2008 to December 5, 2009 and from June 1, 201 to August 30, 201, Defendant A prepared a false work experience certificate with the permission of Defendant B, the owner of the above ship, even though he did not board the decks of the Gu Yanpo-si Yanpo-si (39 tons).

As a result, the defendants conspired to submit a false certificate of work experience on board and renewed the defendant A's sixth mate's license and interfered with the issuance of the license certificate for the ship officer by fraudulent means.

2. Notwithstanding that those who violate the Ship Personnel Act by fraud or other improper means do not obtain a marine officer’s license, the Defendant obtained a marine officer’s license by submitting a false certificate at the date, time, and place specified in paragraph (1).

3. No person who violates the Ship Personnel Act in Defendant B may certify his/her work experience on board falsely.

arrow