beta
Text
Defendant
All appeals filed by A and prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Defendant A1) misunderstanding of facts is not a favorable disease with the intent to fit the victim D, and there was no intention of assault. (2) The sentence of an unreasonable sentencing judgment (two months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.
B. The Prosecutor (as to Defendant B)’s sentence (as to a fine of three million won) by the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. 1) Determination on the grounds of appeal by Defendant A: 1) Determination on the grounds of mistake of facts; Defendant A and the defense counsel argued that the court below did not have a favorable disease with the intent of the Defendant to face the victim D; however, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the charges by taking into account the evidence duly adopted and examined; and rejected the above assertion on the grounds of detailed reasons under the title “Determination on the Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion”; and therefore, it is sufficiently acceptable in the judgment of the court below, and therefore, it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant had a favorable disease that the Defendant intends to face the victim D as stated in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, the above argument by the Defendant is without merit (the defendant’s assertion is without merit because he was a street connected to the police investigation (the defendant’s Ha et al.) and was used for the face of E (the face of this name D).
[2] 2) Determination of the assertion of unfair sentencing is based on the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the following: (a) agreement with the victim, and contingent crimes committed by the defendant; (b) the defendant denies some of the crimes up to the trial; (c) the defendant has a single criminal conviction; and (d) the defendant's age, occupation, and other factors relating to the sentencing stated in the records of this case.