1. The Defendant: KRW 33,974,615 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from July 31, 2018 to May 21, 2019.

1. According to Gap evidence No. 1, where the obligation to pay the price for the goods arises, it can be acknowledged that the plaintiff operating "E" as a livestock products wholesale and retail business operator supplied livestock products to the defendant who runs a food service business with a total amount of KRW 82,821,365 [the total amount of KRW 83,038,865 [the total amount of KRW 217,500 [the total amount of KRW 83,03,038,865]] during the period from October 18, 2017 to July 2, 2018. Accordingly, the defendant is liable to pay the remaining price for the goods to the plaintiff 3,974,615 [the amount of KRW 48,821,365] and delay damages.

2. The defendant's assertion that ① it is improper for the plaintiff to seek a discount sale of livestock products the distribution period of which has been imminent in commercial practices for the plaintiff's supplied products, but ② the plaintiff's demand for payment of the price for the products calculated at normal prices is the aggregate amount of 5,901,560 won [1,847,200 won [20 won per 196,00 won per 196,00 won per delivery (197, 200 won per 196, 200 won per delivery)] (2,200 won per 70,75,000 won per 775,00 won per 205,00 won per delivery (275,000 won per 70,000 won per 196,000 won per delivery, G) or 205,000 won per 20,000 won per 775,000 won per 275,000 won per 194.

① The above argument is that the livestock products supplied by the Plaintiff to the Defendant are products within the distribution period between the parties.