Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On August 31, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in front of the E District of the Military Police Station E District of the Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si on August 31, 2017, and was locked by the E District F, Mana-si, G Habman, who shakes the body of the Defendant, and thereby was shicked, Mana-man.

C. E. E. f. A. E. E. H. H.

The Defendant was able to take a bath at the lower place, she was able to take two times by hand the F’s hand, she was able to take a bath after she was on the back seat of the patrol vehicle for her returning, and she was able to take a bath after she was on the back seat of the patrol vehicle for her returning home. While she continued to take a bath after she was on the back seat of the patrol vehicle for her returning home, she was saluted at the front parking lot of the E Company while she was saluted while she was saluted by cutting off the chest part of the H’s chest while she was pushed back with the left hand, and she was she was saluted by her drinking with her head.

As a result, Defendant 1 maintained the legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of order of Ha F and Police Officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F (including H’s statement part);

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of field photographs, ctv image photographic Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the assertion of mental and physical weakness under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the defendant and his defense counsel had a mental and physical weakness at the time of committing the instant crime.

However, in full view of all the circumstances, such as the background of the crime, details and mode of the crime, the Defendant’s behavior before and after the crime, etc., which can be known by the record, the Defendant had weak ability to discern things or make decisions at the time of the crime in this case.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

Therefore, the above argument is accepted.