1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A: (a) with respect to KRW 224,583,341 and KRW 151,517,434 among them, Defendant A shall be from December 11, 2015 to 73,065.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1) The Plaintiff between Defendant B and Defendant B on May 1, 2009, is the Plaintiff’s Treler hedging (hereinafter “instant Hague”) owned by the Plaintiff to Defendant B.

(2) The Defendant B’s consignment management contract (hereinafter “instant consignment management contract”) with the following purport: (a) the Defendant B, in its delivery, entrusted the management and operation of the instant consignment management contract; (b) the Defendant B, in return, performed the cargo transport as requested by the Plaintiff using the said hedge; and (c) the Defendant B, in return, received the cargo transport fee from the Plaintiff after deducting the monthly

(2) At that time, Defendant B and C re-entrusted Defendant B with the management and operation right of the Hague on May 19, 2009, to Defendant B and C, a freight engineer, to Defendant C and C, the Plaintiff’s cooperative company (hereinafter “Defendant D”) to receive certain management expenses from Defendant C and C, and re-entrusted Defendant B and C with the management and operation right of the Hague.

B. (1) The Defendant A, around April 14, 2010, was involved in the instant accident. Defendant A, at the instant Hague, deemed to be a shower city (vehicles loaded with a container; hereinafter “the shower city of this case”) owned by the Plaintiff.

2) After having performed the freight forwarding service requested by the Plaintiff by connecting to the Plaintiff, while parking the shower of this case at the location where the parking was prohibited from parking along the four-lanes of the 4-lanes road in the Gumdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong, Busan, Busan, and returned to the Republic of Korea. 2) E driving the F-wheeled Vehicle at around 20:58 on the same day, while driving the F-wheeled Vehicle at around 20:58 on the same day, and was parked illegally while driving the above road, and suffered injury, such as an injury to the blood transfusion, etc. due to a conflict with the

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The progress of the relevant lawsuit and the payment of the Plaintiff’s damages on March 22, 2013, the Seoul Central District Court 2013da7933 against the Plaintiff, thereby compensating the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident.