1. Among the lawsuits in this case, the part demanding the cancellation of the income score reduction disposition allocated to the Korean-style cooking technician training technician, and the part demanding the cancellation of the income reduction disposition, which are allocated to the training technician.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was sentenced to 20 years of imprisonment with prison labor for murder, and was reinstated from September 10, 2007 as the above crime, and the expiration date of the term of imprisonment is August 31, 2027.

On December 22, 2015, the Plaintiff was transferred from Busan Prison to the military prison, and around December 24, 2015, the Plaintiff was selected as a rehabilitation trainee of the military prison, and work at the Korean food assistance plant.

On December 7, 2016, the Plaintiff was transferred from the military prison to the Busan Correctional Institution.

B. On December 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) designated the Plaintiff as a person subject to a sound and visual meeting; and (b) revoked the designation of the Plaintiff as a person subject to a sound and visual meeting on July 13, 2016.

C. On May 10, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for the disclosure of information on the assessment of income points and the result of the assessment (the period of exclusive admission).

On May 18, 2016, the Defendant disclosed two copies (No. 2) of the Plaintiff’s income score assessment and the result of the assessment.

On May 24, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a request for disclosure of information with the Defendant on May 24, 2016, on the order of priority in the rating of the correctional records of the traditional Korean occupational trainee in the military prison.

On May 30, 2016, the Defendant notified that the information is confidential pursuant to Article 9(1)4 and 6 of the Official Information Disclosure Act on the ground that “if disclosed, including the matters pertaining to the execution and correction of punishment, it would substantially make it difficult for the Defendant to perform his/her duties, such as classification review and reexamination, and includes matters pertaining to individuals.”

On June 3, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the Defendant’s non-disclosure decision, but the Defendant dismissed the said application on June 13, 2016.

The priority register of correctional records shall be the same as the priority register of attached correctional records.

E. On June 3, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for information disclosure on the assessment of income points and notice (the income score assessment statement signed by the employee in charge) with the Defendant.

On June 14, 2016, the defendant's above information.