logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2017.11.14 2016가단32239
배당이의
Text

1. The limit of KRW 122,790,153 shall apply to the issuance of promissory notes listed in the separate sheet No. 1 list between C and limited liability companies.

Reasons

Basic Facts

Plaintiff C Co., Ltd. (former trade name before the change: F, G Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “C”) on January 11, 2013

(C) On January 14, 2013, U.S. District Court 2013 tea18, U.S. Supreme Court 2013, U.S.C. 75,531,164 won and the amount calculated by the rate of 20% per annum to the Plaintiff jointly and severally with H during the period from January 22, 2013 to the date of full payment.

(2) On January 19, 2015, the instant payment order became final and conclusive on February 6, 2013. (2) On January 19, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) filed an application for a seizure and collection order with the Chuncheon District Court 201,790,153 (the principal =75,531,164 + the interest calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from January 22, 2013 to February 29, 2016 + KRW 46,932,789 + the execution procedure cost + KRW 326,200) with respect to the construction cost, which the Plaintiff had against the Republic of Korea on January 12, 2015 (hereinafter “instant payment order”); and (b) filed an application for a seizure and collection order with the ASEAN District Court 2015,5,500,000 won; and (c) attached the instant construction cost to the Republic of Korea on January 15, 2015.

The Defendant C’s claim 1) C is a limited liability company D on October 13, 2014 (hereinafter “D”).

(B) Promissory Notes listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant Promissory Notes”).

(D) On the same day, a notarial deed that accepts immediate enforcement upon the refusal of payment of the Promissory Notes of this case (hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”).

2) On October 22, 2014, D filed an order of seizure and assignment on the basis of the instant authentic deed with the Chuncheon District Court’s original District Court’s order 2014TTTTT3859, and D filed an order of seizure and assignment (hereinafter “instant seizure and assignment order”) with respect to the instant claim for construction price, and the instant seizure is subject to the instant order.

arrow