Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and fine of 20,000,000 won, Defendant B’s imprisonment of six months and fine of 5,000,000 won, and Defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of the business establishment of the “F” 2nd E in Bupyeong-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul. Defendant B is the head of the business office who comprehensively manages the business establishment, and Defendant C and G are sexual traffic women.

1. Joint criminal conduct by Defendant A and Defendant B

A. Defendant A violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) from January 14, 2013 to September 16, 2013, Defendant A received 100,000 won for commercial sex acts from many unspecified customers, who discovered Internet advertisements, and received 100,000 won for commercial sex acts, including G, and made the above 10,000 won for commercial sex acts, and Defendant B paid 60,000 won out of the above 10,000 won to the commercial sex acts women. From August 24, 2013 to September 16, 2013, Defendant B received a promise from customers in accordance with the said “FF” and provided guidance to customers as commercial sex acts and received the price for commercial sex acts from customers, and managed so-called “commercial sex acts office” as the so-called “commercial head.”

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes as above.

B. On September 5, 2013, the Defendants were under the control of the police and demanded the submission of a lease contract from the police officer to confirm the unemployment, and around September 6, 2013, the Defendants in charge of forging private documents and uttering of falsified documents were under the investigation by the Busan High Police Station, and the lessee of the lease contract under the above 205 is A and the lessee of the lease contract also entered as A. However, the lessee was to use the lease contract under the above 205 owner I, which became B for the purpose of backing as if the unemployed is B, to submit the lease contract under the name of the owner of the above 205 owner.

The Defendants around September 13, 2013, from the above "F" around a.m., Defendant A brought about a form of an empty lease contract in the above businesses, and Defendant B had Defendant A using the visible pension.