logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.01.11 2018고단1001
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On March 15, 201, the Defendant received a summary order of fine of two million won by violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Jeonju District Court on March 15, 201, and a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the same court on February 26, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

On August 14, 2018, at around 08:20, the Defendant driven a eM6-car under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.057% from the section of about 15k to the eM6-car under the influence of alcohol content on the e-car under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.057% on the e-car in the direction of the Dpenta, located in the C neighboring area located in the Freeju-gun B, the same day from 08:42.

As a result, the defendant, who committed a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notice of the result of the crackdown on drinking driving, and report on the situation of drinking drivers;

1. Before ruling: Application of criminal records, reply reports on criminal records, investigation reports (a copy of summary order of the same kind of crime) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines for the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order has a record of having been punished three times due to drunk driving in 2006, 201, and 2014, there is no other criminal records other than the punishment imposed three times due to the fine as above, and the defendant thought that he was aware that he was aware that he was aware that he was aware that he was aware of his own her frith and her frith from among his her friend and friend who was drinking in the amusement park, and that he was exposed to drinking control near Tolart and that he was found to have been aware of his frith and her frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith fel

arrow