1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received construction from Yongcheon-si, Youngcheon-si to supply and demand “project for the maintenance of dangerous reservoirs in danger of disaster;” (b) the Plaintiff, from the Defendant on February 19, 2016, contracted the relevant maintenance project with construction cost of KRW 210,336,00 (including value-added tax) among the said maintenance project.

나. 원고, 피고 및 영천시는 2016. 5. 19. 하도급거래 공정화에 관한 법률 제14조 등에 따라 다음과 같이 하도급대금 직접지급 합의(이하 ‘이 사건 합의’라 한다)를 하였다. 하도급대금 직접지급 방법 및 절차 - 기성검사 및 준공검사시 하수급인(원고)이 시공한 부분에 대한 내역을 구분하여 신청하고 하도급대금의 지급청구도 분리청구하는 것을 원칙으로 하고, 부득이한 경우 수급인(피고)이 일괄신청 및 청구할 수 있으니 하도급대금은 하수급인에게 직접 지급하기로 함 - 발주자(영천시)의 수급인에 대한 대가지급채무와 수급인의 하수급인에 �나 하도급대금 지급채무는 하도급거래 공정화에 관한 법률 제14조의 규정에 따라 그 범위 내에서 소멸한 것으로 봄

C. On August 29, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted the completion system to the Director General of the Korea Water Resources Corporation, the supervisory authority of the instant construction, and the same year.

9.12. A report was issued by the Supervisory Board to the effect that the construction has been completed;

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8

2. Determination as to the claim

A. Although the plaintiff completed the construction of this case, the defendant did not pay the construction price of this case, and the defendant did not pay the subcontract price directly to the plaintiff at Youngcheon-si. Thus, the defendant's construction price of this case to the plaintiff.