A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 9, 2016, the Defendant driven a B observer car at around 20:20, and operated a straight line in the direction of the lower part of the hotel at the seat of the hotel at the intersection, such as a signal at the 116-ro nives of the Busan nivesp, the Defendant straighted directly in the direction of the lower part of the hotel.

There was a duty of care to operate in accordance with the new code because the traffic has been controlled by the signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by negligence in violation of the signal, got the front part of the D Driving of the Victim C (36 tax) driving who left the left at the right side of the course of the course of the course of the course of the collision with the victim's driver's license, and took about about two weeks of the front part of the Defendant's vehicle with the front part of the driver's license, thereby causing the victim's acute climatic clisome in need of treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, destroyed the damaged vehicle's repair cost to exceed KRW 1,995,00 and escaped without taking necessary measures

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, which orders the observation and instruction of protection, does not present a separate criteria for the ordinary concurrent crimes. As such, the sentencing criteria do not apply to this case.

It shall be sentenced to the same sentence as the order in consideration of the fact that the person has subscribed to liability insurance and has agreed with the victim, the fact that the crime is recognized and reflected.