beta
Text
1. The decision that the Defendant rendered against Plaintiff B on March 21, 2018 constitutes a pension for wounds.
2. The plaintiff A's claim.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On January 8, 192, while serving as the captain of the Army Group 121 and 2nd C, Plaintiff A was killed in the line of duty and was killed in the ethma and the inside and outside of the area of the road while making a patrol on January 8, 192, while serving as the captain of the Army Group 50 Team 121, the Plaintiff A was killed in the line of duty in the line of duty, and was killed in the ethma and the inside and outside of the road. While the treatment was provided by the National Armed Forces Hospital from January 14, 192 to April 28, 192, the medical treatment was performed by the National Armed Forces Hospital from January 14, 1992,
(2) On April 12, 1996, Plaintiff A was subject to the judgment of grade 6 (2) and 3107 of the injury rating of the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff B’s injury”) on 2007, and confirmed that there was a shaking of an inner part, etc. as a result of the physical examination at a military hospital. Plaintiff B was discharged on December 31, 1993. Plaintiff B was discharged from military service on 1993. As a result, Plaintiff B was discharged from military service on the face, hand, and on the right side bridge around the military unit, while she was discharged from military service on 12 April 1996, while she was assigned as a military noncommissioned officer and was on duty in the communications support unit for the 9th Special Rabnan, and suffered image on the face, hand, and the scarcity of the skin’s injury rating (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff B’s injury disease”), and around 2014, Plaintiff B was judged to be in the injury of two or more.
On July 31, 1999, discharged from military service.
B. On March 21, 2018, the Plaintiffs filed an application for the payment of a wounded veterans' pension and the Defendant’s dismissal decision filed a claim for the payment of a wounded veterans’ pension on the ground that they retired from office due to an injury caused by official duties. However, on the ground that “the Plaintiffs had already a chest disability at the time of each retirement, and at that time, a male who remains a chest in law is not eligible for a wounded veterans’ pension” (hereinafter “each disposition of this case”).
recognized.