Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On October 6, 2015, at around 23:50, the Defendant, at the entrance of the 33rd village village of the Seo-gu Seo-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Incheon, driven the Defendant’s vehicle on behalf of the Defendant and arrived at the above site on the same day, but as a result, the Defendant was unable to pay the substitute driving fee due to the absence of cash, and was assaulted when flading the victim’s flaps and drinking face.
2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act. Since the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant on February 22, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this part is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.