A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Seized evidence1 through 14 shall be confiscated from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

1. The fraud means that the defendant assumes a false phone to a public prosecutor's office, loan company, etc. and assumes a false phone to the general public in the Republic of Korea, and that "the bank account is being created and used", and "to receive a loan, credit rating, stamp tax, guarantee insurance premium, etc. shall be deposited." The defendant shall have the victims transfer the money to the bank account by deceiving the victims to the bank account, notify the victims of the security card number and certification number of the Internet banking, and using this to make the victims notify the victims of the security card number and certification number of the Internet banking, and then shall make the victims withdraw the money from the bank account by the means of transferring the money from the bank account.

On December 2, 2013, the Defendant received 15-200,000 won per day from the head of the Dong office, who was instructed by a person who was not killed in a name, who was a senior policeman, and was recruited in order with the above officers to take charge of account transfer or withdrawal through cash withdrawal machines.

On January 13, 2013, the Defendant conspired with the conciliation staff in the order above, and transferred the money to the corporate bank account in the name of the Defendant or to the account of the conciliation staff notified by the chief of the said D office, despite the fact that the Nonparty did not have the intent or ability to grant a loan to the victim E, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E, stating that “I would immediately grant a loan because it is possible to lend at low interest, and if you transfer the money necessary to make a computerized registration.” The Defendant withdrawn the money deposited to the bank account in the name of the Defendant or to the account of the conciliation staff notified by the chief of the said D office.

As such, the Defendant, in collusion with the investigating staff in the name of the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, and by deceiving 4.9 million won from the victim to the agricultural bank account in the name of F, and as indicated in the attached list of crimes (1).