logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.06.21 2016나1526
소유권이전등기 말소등기
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, each real estate listed in attached Table 1, 6, and 7 of the plaintiffs' 1 real estate list against the defendant C.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1) The deceased L (Death on March 2, 1978) generated the network N (Death on May 13, 195), the Defendant C, the networkO (Death on October 22, 201), the Defendant D, E, and the network P (Death on October 29, 201) between the deceased M (Death on March 25, 195), who is the spouse, and the network N generated the Plaintiff and the Defendant F (Death on June 29, 201) by marriage with the Plaintiff B.

3) If the plaintiffs and the defendants' shares of inheritance are calculated, the ownership transfer registration in the name of the defendant C was made in accordance with the Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate as of the date of the ownership transfer, the ownership transfer registration in the name of the defendant C, the ownership transfer registration in the name of the defendant C (which is Q Q in the register of the defendant C (which seems to be a clerical error in the entry), the ownership registration in the name of the defendant C (which seems to be a clerical error in the register of the defendant), and the real estate in paragraph (4) are registered in the name of the defendant C, and the ownership registration in the name of the defendant C, the ownership registration in the name of the defendant C, and the real estate in paragraph (5),6, and paragraph (7) are registered for each sale.

2) Attached 2 List of Real Estate (hereinafter “Attachment 2”)

2) Each of the real estate described above is a real estate subject to registration of ownership transfer in the name of the network L, or its owner is a network R with the network L or network L, both of which are owned by the land cadastre. 【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, A’s evidence 2 through 6 (if any, including the number; hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. The reasoning of this part of the plaintiffs' assertion is the same as that of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

A. 1 ex officio, the determination of the real estate stated in Paragraph 1 of the 1 List is based on property rights, such as ownership or ownership due to inheritance, on the premise that the person himself/herself is a true heir.

arrow