logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.09.30 2015나43599
기타(금전)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following judgments, thereby citing it as is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Plaintiff asserts that the additional determination does not include the Plaintiff’s extra expense and the Plaintiff’s claims against private teaching institute expense when preparing the evidence Nos. 2 and 3 with the Defendants, and that the amount of the Plaintiff’s claim against the Plaintiff, such as the card use fee and Defendant B’s wage requested by the Defendants, is merely limited to the amount of claim against the Defendants, and that the amount remains after deducting the Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendants and the Plaintiff’s claims against private teaching institute expense from the amount of claim against the Plaintiff.

However, according to the Plaintiff’s assertion, the above KRW 11,70,000 is the amount that the Defendants paid to the Plaintiff as a result of the Plaintiff’s intensive indication of learning for individual extracurricular lessons. However, considering that the Defendants requested the Plaintiff, who was the son of the previous private teaching institute of the Plaintiff D, to provide the Plaintiff with the extracurricular lessons after three months, and that the Plaintiff’s individual extracurricular E was also requested, and that the performance of D and E was improved, insofar as the Plaintiff’s extracurricular programs and the amount of the private teaching institute fees are not proven, such assertion by the Plaintiff cannot be easily accepted.

3. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow