1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff is the party’s position 1) The Plaintiff’s “D” in the Guri-si, Guri-si, means the compression of the instant strike (hereinafter “the compression of the instant strike”).

2) The Defendant is operating the recycling center in the name of Dong-si E (hereinafter “F”).

B. On February 4, 2014, when a fire occurred at around 16:20 (hereinafter “instant fire”) from the compression of the instant fire, the fire was destroyed by approximately 600 tons of the wave, compressed machines, and fixed strings, and the fire was destroyed by the fire’s container at the nearby location due to the spread of the said fire, and the house strings, etc. inside the fire.

C. 1) Investigation into the cause of the instant fire was concluded that the Guide fire station, which completed a field investigation after the instant fire, was presumed to be a sedi and inflammable fire by the U.S. fire. The grounds are as follows: ① although there was a compressed machine around the point where the fire was presumed to have occurred but the electric breaker was not operated at the time and there was no trace of the exhaustr; thus, there was no possibility of an electrical breaker due to electrical factors. ② The possibility of an outbreak due to mechanical factors, such as heat in the exhaustr system, is low in view of the fact that there was no use of compressed machines or cargo vehicles. ③ According to CCTV video image, there was no passage of people at the place where the fire was presumed to have occurred, and thus, there was no possibility of a fire outbreak or a sedition by a boat. ④ While there was no possibility of a fire outbreak from the recycling center in the instant case at a distance of 9m from the point where the fire occurred to the point where it was impossible to readily conclude it as a witness from the former CCTV police station.