1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 6,025,590; (b) KRW 17,46,945; (c) KRW 17,310,996; and (d) KRW 17,466.

1. Basic facts

A. Outline of the rearrangement project - Project name: F Housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as “instant rearrangement project”): Defendant - Project implementer: The location and size of the rearrangement zone: 8,224.8 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant rearrangement zone”): The public inspection and public announcement date of the rearrangement plan concerning the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as “instant rearrangement zone”): January 31, 2008 - the authorization date for establishment: March 26, 2008 - the authorization for project implementation: August 8, 2012 (Public Notification of Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City)

B. From November 13, 2003, Plaintiff A is a tenant who is residing in a residential building in the instant improvement zone from November 13, 2003, and the remaining plaintiffs are the owners of residential buildings in the instant improvement zone, who did not apply for an application for an parcelling-out during the period of application for

C. The Defendant filed an application for adjudication of expropriation with the local Land Tribunal in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which did not reach an agreement with the owners of the land, etc. in the instant improvement zone, and on February 26, 2016, the said Committee rendered a ruling of expropriation on April 15, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 to 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the facts established prior to the determination on the cause of the claim, the plaintiff A was the tenant of a residential building to be relocated to the implementation of the instant improvement project at the time of the public inspection and announcement of the improvement plan, and the remaining plaintiffs were the owners of the residential building located in the instant improvement zone and the persons who resided in the said building until the date of the decision on expropriation and expropriation of the residential building located in the instant improvement zone, and have been relocated to the outside of the instant improvement zone due to the implementation of the relevant improvement project. In accordance with Article 78(1) and (5) of the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation Therefor, Article 41 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, and Articles 53, 54 and 55 of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act, the relocation settlement