1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasons for the court’s explanation is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is consistent with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Article 13 (No. 6) of the 6th through No. 13th, “No. 8th,” provides that “(4) the calculation basis for the amount of sewage generation of the instant disposition shall be compared to the calculation of the amount borne by the sewerage from September 25, 2013, the total amount of sewage generation, the amount discharged outside the earth, and the amount of deduction from the amount of the existing building generated, shall be substantially identical, and only the amount of deduction from the amount of the existing building generated,” and “(5)” is added to “(4) the Defendant fails to clearly state the grounds for not deducting the amount of sewage generated at the time of the instant disposition, unlike the previous disposition (the imposition of the amount borne by the sewerage from September 25, 20

The 14th parallels 17 to 15th parallels shall be followed as follows:

5) Pursuant to Article 19(2) of the former Ordinance, the amount borne by the burden of sewerage shall be calculated by multiplying the amount of sewage generated in the year of the completion of other acts by the unit price (cost/ cubic metres/day).

On April 30, 2009, the amount borne by the legitimate sewerage burden shall be 8,063,440,00 won [the amount borne by the legitimate sewerage burden shall be 8,063,40 cubic meters [the amount of sewage generation = 16,940 cubic meters x 952,000 cubic meters x 50 per unit unit price x 50 per cubic meters x 50%) if the amount of sewage generation in the instant industrial complex from 17,584 cubic meters/day to 17,584 cubic meters/day, and the amount of sewage generation calculated after deducting all the 16,943 cubic meters/day from the volume of sewage generation in the instant industrial complex from 16,94 cubic meters/day, and 16

Therefore, the part exceeding KRW 863,440,00, which deducts KRW 7,200,000,000, which is the amount to be paid at KRW 8,063,440,00 among the dispositions of this case, shall be revoked as it is unlawful.

A person shall be appointed.

2. The plaintiff's primary claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the conjunctive claim is justified within the scope of the above recognition.