beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On September 1, 1986, the Plaintiff was newly appointed as a public official of Grade 9 in educational administrative service and served as the head of the Office of Education (Grade 6) at B High School from January 20, 201 to December 31, 2013. From January 1, 2014, the Plaintiff served as the head of the Office of Administration (Grade 6) at C Elementary School from January 1, 201 to the head of the Office of Administration.
B. On October 3, 2014, based on the result of the service audit conducted at B High Schools, the Defendant was subject to two months of suspension from office on the ground that the Plaintiff violated the duty of good faith and the duty of maintenance of dignity as follows:
The Plaintiff breached the duty of good faith in disciplinary reasons (Disciplinary Reason 1) (the Plaintiff received overtime work allowances of KRW 13,241,730 from 201 to 2013 in a false or unjust manner on the ground that he/she received an order for overtime work from the principal E and F to receive an order for overtime work and approval for overtime work, even though he/she kept in the school during overtime work hours while serving as the head of B High School administrative office.
Since 2012, the Plaintiff breached the duty to maintain dignity (grounds of disciplinary action) caused 1 to 3 to 4 times a week during the semester to be an administrative office where dietitians and cooks work for him/her without eating meals in a restaurant at a restaurant, and brought about 1 to 3 to 4 times a week during the vacations.
As the Gyeonggi-do Ordinance on the Management of Public Property under the jurisdiction of the Special Accounts for Gyeonggi-do Educational Expenses (Disciplinary Grounds) has been amended (No. 4373, May 10, 2012), if the use of school facilities, such as gymnasiums and auditoriums, is permitted to local residents for more than two hours but not more than four hours, 45,000 won shall be collected each time, notwithstanding the fact that the Plaintiff is obliged to collect user fees for facilities from G clubs on February 23, 2013, when collecting user fees for facilities from G clubs on February 23, 2013 (=360 x 4 x 4 x 10,000 x 50 x 50 %), the Plaintiff’s legitimate amount to collect 8,100,000 won (i.e., 360 days x 45,000 x 50 %) more than the above Ordinance and makes it improper to collect public property.