The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) does not harm the victim when considering the victim, as stated in the facts charged of this case.

2. Determination

A. The lower court acknowledged the Defendant’s assertion of facts based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, namely, ① the victim has consistently stated the facts of damage as described in the facts charged from the investigative agency to the court below, and there is no particular circumstance to suspect the credibility of the victim’s statement. ② On July 30, 2019, the victim was diagnosed to the effect that “the victim’s crypium and tension before and after the occurrence of the instant case, it is necessary to provide three-time treatment.” The above diagnosis date is close to the point and time of the instant accident, and there is no special circumstance to doubt the credibility of the victim’s face during the process of issuing the written diagnosis of injury; ③ The victim’s statement and the victim’s face should not be confirmed from the police officer in charge of the instant case, and the victim’s statement and the victim’s face should not be confirmed by the victim’s statement and the victim’s statement made on July 17, 2019.