logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.07.16 2014고단4653
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the execution of each of the above imprisonment for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant operated a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name "E" in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and provided 7 sexual traffic rooms and 3 drinking rooms, etc., and employed 6 female employees, such as F and G, under the condition that half of the price paid for each customer is paid to him/her, as a female employee, and let the said F perform sexual intercourse with male customers around September 2014, and from September 12, 2014 to September 30, 2014, Defendant A received the payment.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.

2. Defendant B, who was owned by H during the period described in paragraph (1), leased the place indicated in paragraph (1), which was a building in which the Defendant had been operating a sexual traffic business as a previous owner, from H, and provided A with a place of sexual traffic by allowing it to operate a sexual traffic business as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

[Fact 1]

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Each statement of F, G, I, J, K, L, M, and N;

1. On-site photographs (the fact of No. 2 on-board);

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Part of the prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Part of the protocol of interrogation of the police as to Defendant B (including Defendant A’s statement)

1. The police statement of H;

1. A prosecutorial statement prepared by Defendant A;

1. On-site photographs;

1. An investigation report (as shown in B hospital medical records, evidence list Nos. 14, 14, hereinafter referred to as “net 14”), medical records, notification of communication data, extraction of the relevant parts of the telephone conversations (as shown in No. 22), an investigation report (Attachment of a summary order of the same kind as A, No. 38), an investigation report (Attachment of a summary order of the same kind to B, No. 40), each summary order (No. 39, No. 41) and his defense counsel are criminal facts committed against Defendant A.

arrow