A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 339] Around 01:40 on January 7, 2014, the Defendant expressed that the Defendant would pay the taxi expenses in front of the old car agency located in Jinju-si, Jin-si, a police officer belonging to the Jin-gu Police Station B District B, who was called out after having received a report that the Defendant did not pay the taxi expenses while taking a bath, and recommended the Defendant to pay the taxi expenses. The Defendant assaulted the part of C at one time on the floor of the hand, “this rings, fump, fump, fump, fump, fump, fump, fump, fump, fump, fump, fump, fump, fump, fump, fump.

As a result, the defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate execution of duties to investigate crimes and maintain public order.

[2014 Highest 565]

1. Around 05:20 on May 11, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant interfered with the operation of the victim’s restaurant by force for about 10 minutes until about 05:30 minutes on the same day, such as: (a) the Defendant continued to make the victim and his wife H continue to engage in drinking with the victim’s ‘F’ restaurant operated by the victim E in Jinju-si; (b) the Defendant continued to engage in drinking with the daily G with the victim without any justifiable reason while drinking the alcohol; and (c) let the victim and his wife H take five customers drinking in the above restaurant.

2. At around 05:28, May 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed an desire for the victim of the instant case, i.e., a slope belonging to the Jinju Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112, to be asked about the details of the instant case and personal information from the victim I, a slope belonging to the Jinju Police Station, who was called out after receiving a report of 112; and (b) the victim was reported by the said E and his employees, such as “Yae, Chewing typia, and nife, a police officer.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to J, C, and E;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (victim E telephone conversations);

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties) and Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.