1. The Defendants: (a) from March 28, 2014 to September 2, 2014, the Defendants’ respective Plaintiff KRW 26,346,420; and (b) from March 28, 2014 to Defendant A.

1. According to the purport of Gap evidence No. 1 to No. 4 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff entered into an insurance-free motor vehicle insurance contract with the non-party B as the insured; the defendant limited liability company's anti-car company (hereinafter "the defendant company"); the defendant Gap driving of the instant motor vehicle at around 13:45 on May 20, 2013, while driving the two lines of the instant motor vehicle located in the middle-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Cranc as the epic as the epictic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epic epi eg epi eg eg e.

According to the above facts, the Defendants are obligated to pay to each Plaintiff for tort liability under the Civil Act or under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, for the government guarantee business insurance money paid by the Plaintiff to B, for the total sum of 26,346,420 won of the insurance money for non-insured injury guaranteed by the Plaintiff, and for the seal of Defendant A, on which a duplicate of the instant complaint was served from March 28, 2014, until September 2, 2014; and for the Defendant Company, until December 3, 2014, 5% per annum under each Civil Act and 20% per annum under each Act on Special Cases Concerning Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the date of full payment.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.